The Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) project, maintained by the MITRE Corporation, is a list of all standardized names for vulnerabilities and security exposures.
ID | Description | Priority | Modified date |
---|---|---|---|
CVE-2004-2770 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2011-3389. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2011-3389. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2011-3389 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage.Per http://ekoparty.org/2011/juliano-rizzo.php, \'Our exploit abuses a vulnerability present in the SSL/TLS implementation of major Web browsers at the time of writing.\' The current configuration includes released versions of major browsers. List subject to change based on additional information as it becomes available. | REJECT | Sep 28, 2011 |
CVE-2006-2493 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-1861. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2006-1861. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-1861 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | REJECT | Sep 10, 2008 |
CVE-2006-2938 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-2937. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. it was incorrectly used to identify CVE-2006-2937. Notes: none. | REJECT | Sep 10, 2008 |
CVE-2006-2939 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none. | REJECT | Sep 10, 2008 |
CVE-2006-5756 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2006. Notes: none. | REJECT | Sep 10, 2008 |
CVE-2006-6098 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2006. Notes: none. | REJECT | Sep 10, 2008 |
CVE-2006-6099 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2006. Notes: none. | REJECT | Sep 10, 2008 |
CVE-2006-6100 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2006. Notes: none. | REJECT | Sep 10, 2008 |
CVE-2006-6491 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2006. Notes: none. | REJECT | Sep 10, 2008 |
CVE-2006-6492 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2006. Notes: none. | REJECT | Sep 10, 2008 |
CVE-2006-7084 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-7083. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2006-7083. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-7083 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | REJECT | Sep 10, 2008 |
CVE-2006-7224 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-7227, CVE-2005-4872, CVE-2006-7228. Reason: this candidate was SPLIT into other identifiers in order to reflect different affected versions and distinct vendor fixes. Notes: All CVE users should consult CVE-2006-7227, CVE-2005-4872, and CVE-2006-7228 to determine which ID is appropriate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | REJECT | Sep 10, 2008 |
CVE-2007-1323 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-2893. Reason: this candidate was intended for one issue, but some sources used this identifier for a separate issue, and a duplicate identifier had also been created by the time dual use was detected. Notes: All CVE users should consult CVE-2007-2893 to determine if it is appropriate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | REJECT | Sep 10, 2008 |
CVE-2007-1783 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-1685. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-1685. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-1685 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | REJECT | Feb 24, 2011 |
CVE-2007-4576 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-4575. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2007-4575. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-4575 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | REJECT | Feb 12, 2008 |
CVE-2007-4851 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-5137. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-5137. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-5137 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | REJECT | Sep 10, 2008 |
CVE-2007-4989 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-4568. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2007-4568. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-4568 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | REJECT | Sep 10, 2008 |
CVE-2007-5324 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-2582. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-2582. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-2582 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | REJECT | Sep 10, 2008 |
CVE-2007-5336 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-5339. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2007-5339. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-5339 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | REJECT | Sep 10, 2008 |
CVE-2007-5421 | ** REJECT ** Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in Cisco IOS 12.x and IOS XR allow attackers to execute arbitrary code, as demonstrated via the "Bind Shell", "Reverse Shell", and "Two byte rootshell (Tiny Shell)" attacks. NOTE: the vendor and researcher agree that this issue does not cross privilege boundaries, saying they do not "represent a vulnerability." The disclosure was intended to demonstrate techniques for exploitation, which is not covered by CVE. | REJECT | Nov 7, 2023 |
CVE-2007-5499 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none. | REJECT | Sep 10, 2008 |
CVE-2007-5670 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-5956. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-5956. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-5956 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | REJECT | Sep 10, 2008 |
CVE-2007-5759 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-6335. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-6335. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-6335 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | REJECT | Sep 10, 2008 |
CVE-2007-5763 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-0401. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2008-0401. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-0401 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | REJECT | Sep 10, 2008 |
CVE-2007-5968 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-6313. Reason: this candidate\'s description and references were inconsistent and described unrelated, non-security issues. The original intended issue is covered by CVE-2007-6313. Notes: All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | REJECT | Feb 26, 2008 |
CVE-2007-6132 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | REJECT | Sep 10, 2008 |
CVE-2008-0004 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | REJECT | Mar 26, 2009 |
CVE-2008-0188 | DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its requester. Further investigation showed that it was not a Unchanged security issue. Notes: none. | REJECT | Nov 7, 2023 |
CVE-2008-0189 | DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its requester. Further investigation showed that it was not a Unchanged security issue. Notes: none. | REJECT | Nov 7, 2023 |
CVE-2008-0886 | * REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-0882. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-0882. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-0882 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | REJECT | Nov 7, 2023 |
CVE-2008-0929 | DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | REJECT | Nov 7, 2023 |
CVE-2008-1378 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-2360, CVE-2008-2361, CVE-2008-2362. Reason: This candidate has been withdrawn by its CNA. It was SPLIT into separate candidates before publication. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-2360, CVE-2008-2361, and CVE-2008-2362 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | REJECT | Mar 26, 2009 |
CVE-2008-1674 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | REJECT | Mar 26, 2009 |
CVE-2008-1781 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its requester. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | REJECT | Apr 15, 2008 |
CVE-2008-2373 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-2863. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2008-2863. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-2863 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | REJECT | Mar 26, 2009 |
CVE-2008-2546 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-1805. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2008-1805. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-1805 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | REJECT | Sep 11, 2008 |
CVE-2008-2727 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-2725. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-2725. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-2725 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | REJECT | Sep 10, 2008 |
CVE-2008-2728 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-2726. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-2726. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-2726 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | REJECT | Sep 10, 2008 |
CVE-2008-2737 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-3558. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-3558. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-3558 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | REJECT | Sep 11, 2008 |
CVE-2008-2804 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-2800. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2008-2800. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-2800 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | REJECT | Mar 26, 2009 |
CVE-2008-3284 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-3283. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2008-3283. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-3283 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | REJECT | Mar 26, 2009 |
CVE-2008-3517 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-3522. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2008-3522. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-3522 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | REJECT | Mar 26, 2009 |
CVE-2008-3518 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-3283. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2008-3283. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-3283 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | REJECT | Mar 26, 2009 |
CVE-2008-4042 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-3889. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-3889. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-3889 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | REJECT | Sep 17, 2008 |
CVE-2008-4112 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-3195. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-3195. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-3195 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | REJECT | Sep 24, 2008 |
CVE-2008-4270 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-5416. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-5416. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-5416 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | REJECT | Dec 30, 2008 |
CVE-2008-4312 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | REJECT | Mar 29, 2009 |
CVE-2008-4317 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-5019. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2008-5019. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-5019 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | REJECT | Mar 26, 2009 |
CVE-2008-4422 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-4409. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-4409. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-4409 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | REJECT | Oct 7, 2008 |
CVE-2008-4430 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-3699. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-3699. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-3699 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | REJECT | Oct 10, 2008 |