Scheduled maintenance: Some features related to account registration and licensing may be temporarily unavailable from Friday (May 8) at 1 PM to Sunday (May 10) at 5 PM (PST).
HomeDefectsLIN1025-13948
Acknowledged

LIN1025-13948 : Security Advisory - linux - CVE-2026-43067

Created: May 5, 2026    Updated: May 7, 2026
Found In Version: 10.25.33.2
Severity: Standard
Applicable for: Wind River Linux LTS 25
Component/s: Kernel

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:  ext4: handle wraparound when searching for blocks for indirect mapped blocks  Commit 4865c768b563 ("ext4: always allocate blocks only from groups inode can use") restricts what blocks will be allocated for indirect block based files to block numbers that fit within 32-bit block numbers.  However, when using a review bot running on the latest Gemini LLM to check this commit when backporting into an LTS based kernel, it raised this concern:     If ac->ac_g_ex.fe_group is >= ngroups (for instance, if the goal    group was populated via stream allocation from s_mb_last_groups),    then start will be >= ngroups.     Does this allow allocating blocks beyond the 32-bit limit for    indirect block mapped files? The commit message mentions that    ext4_mb_scan_groups_linear() takes care to not select unsupported    groups. However, its loop uses group = *start, and the very first    iteration will call ext4_mb_scan_group() with this unsupported    group because next_linear_group() is only called at the end of the    iteration.  After reviewing the code paths involved and considering the LLM review, I determined that this can happen when there is a file system where some files/directories are extent-mapped and others are indirect-block mapped.  To address this, add a safety clamp in ext4_mb_scan_groups().