HomeDefectsLIN1024-21533
Fixed

LIN1024-21533 : Security Advisory - linux - CVE-2026-45858

Created: May 28, 2026    Updated: Jun 1, 2026
Resolved Date: May 28, 2026
Found In Version: 10.24.33.2
Fix Version: 10.24.33.17
Severity: Standard
Applicable for: Wind River Linux LTS 24
Component/s: Kernel

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:  ext4: don't zero the entire extent if EXT4_EXT_DATA_PARTIAL_VALID1  When allocating initialized blocks from a large unwritten extent, or when splitting an unwritten extent during end I/O and converting it to initialized, there is currently a potential issue of stale data if the extent needs to be split in the middle.         0  A      B  N        UUUUUUUUUUUU]    U: unwritten extent        [--DDDDDDDD--]    D: valid data            (<-  ->| ----> this range needs to be initialized  ext4_split_extent() first try to split this extent at B with EXT4_EXT_DATA_ENTIRE_VALID1 and EXT4_EXT_MAY_ZEROOUT flag set, but ext4_split_extent_at() failed to split this extent due to temporary lack of space. It zeroout B to N and mark the entire extent from 0 to N as written.         0  A      B  N        [WWWWWWWWWWWW)    W: written extent        SSDDDDDDDDZZ]    Z: zeroed, S: stale data  ext4_split_extent() then try to split this extent at A with EXT4_EXT_DATA_VALID2 flag set. This time, it split successfully and left a stale written extent from 0 to A.         0  A      B   N        [WW (WWWWWWWWWW)        SS (DDDDDDDDZZ)  Fix this by pass EXT4_EXT_DATA_PARTIAL_VALID1 to ext4_split_extent_at() when splitting at B, don't convert the entire extent to written and left it as unwritten after zeroing out B to N. The remaining work is just like the standard two-part split. ext4_split_extent() will pass the EXT4_EXT_DATA_VALID2 flag when it calls ext4_split_extent_at() for the second time, allowing it to properly handle the split. If the split is successful, it will keep extent from 0 to A as unwritten.

CVEs