Wind River Support Network

HomeDefectsLIN1023-15319
Fixed

LIN1023-15319 : Security Advisory - linux - CVE-2023-53369

Created: Sep 19, 2025    Updated: Sep 22, 2025
Resolved Date: Sep 22, 2025
Found In Version: 10.23.30.1
Fix Version: 10.23.30.2
Severity: Standard
Applicable for: Wind River Linux LTS 23
Component/s: Kernel

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:  net: dcb: choose correct policy to parse DCB_ATTR_BCN  The dcbnl_bcn_setcfg uses erroneous policy to parse tb[DCB_ATTR_BCN], which is introduced in commit 859ee3c43812 ("DCB: Add support for DCB BCN"). Please see the comment in below code  static int dcbnl_bcn_setcfg(...) {   ...   ret = nla_parse_nested_deprecated(..., dcbnl_pfc_up_nest, .. )   // !!! dcbnl_pfc_up_nest for attributes   //  DCB_PFC_UP_ATTR_0 to DCB_PFC_UP_ATTR_ALL in enum dcbnl_pfc_up_attrs   ...   for (i = DCB_BCN_ATTR_RP_0; i <= DCB_BCN_ATTR_RP_7; i++) {   // !!! DCB_BCN_ATTR_RP_0 to DCB_BCN_ATTR_RP_7 in enum dcbnl_bcn_attrs     ...     value_byte = nla_get_u8(data[i]);     ...   }   ...   for (i = DCB_BCN_ATTR_BCNA_0; i <= DCB_BCN_ATTR_RI; i++) {   // !!! DCB_BCN_ATTR_BCNA_0 to DCB_BCN_ATTR_RI in enum dcbnl_bcn_attrs   ...     value_int = nla_get_u32(data[i]);   ...   }   ... }  That is, the nla_parse_nested_deprecated uses dcbnl_pfc_up_nest attributes to parse nlattr defined in dcbnl_pfc_up_attrs. But the following access code fetch each nlattr as dcbnl_bcn_attrs attributes. By looking up the associated nla_policy for dcbnl_bcn_attrs. We can find the beginning part of these two policies are "same".  static const struct nla_policy dcbnl_pfc_up_nest[...] = {         [DCB_PFC_UP_ATTR_0]   = {.type = NLA_U8},         [DCB_PFC_UP_ATTR_1]   = {.type = NLA_U8},         [DCB_PFC_UP_ATTR_2]   = {.type = NLA_U8},         [DCB_PFC_UP_ATTR_3]   = {.type = NLA_U8},         [DCB_PFC_UP_ATTR_4]   = {.type = NLA_U8},         [DCB_PFC_UP_ATTR_5]   = {.type = NLA_U8},         [DCB_PFC_UP_ATTR_6]   = {.type = NLA_U8},         [DCB_PFC_UP_ATTR_7]   = {.type = NLA_U8},         [DCB_PFC_UP_ATTR_ALL] = {.type = NLA_FLAG}, };  static const struct nla_policy dcbnl_bcn_nest[...] = {         [DCB_BCN_ATTR_RP_0]         = {.type = NLA_U8},         [DCB_BCN_ATTR_RP_1]         = {.type = NLA_U8},         [DCB_BCN_ATTR_RP_2]         = {.type = NLA_U8},         [DCB_BCN_ATTR_RP_3]         = {.type = NLA_U8},         [DCB_BCN_ATTR_RP_4]         = {.type = NLA_U8},         [DCB_BCN_ATTR_RP_5]         = {.type = NLA_U8},         [DCB_BCN_ATTR_RP_6]         = {.type = NLA_U8},         [DCB_BCN_ATTR_RP_7]         = {.type = NLA_U8},         [DCB_BCN_ATTR_RP_ALL]       = {.type = NLA_FLAG},         // from here is somewhat different         [DCB_BCN_ATTR_BCNA_0]       = {.type = NLA_U32},         ...         [DCB_BCN_ATTR_ALL]          = {.type = NLA_FLAG}, };  Therefore, the current code is buggy and this nla_parse_nested_deprecated could overflow the dcbnl_pfc_up_nest and use the adjacent nla_policy to parse attributes from DCB_BCN_ATTR_BCNA_0.  Hence use the correct policy dcbnl_bcn_nest to parse the nested tb[DCB_ATTR_BCN] TLV.

CVEs


Live chat
Online