Fixed
Created: May 6, 2025
Updated: Jun 10, 2025
Resolved Date: May 28, 2025
Found In Version: 10.22.33.1
Fix Version: 10.22.33.21
Severity: Standard
Applicable for: Wind River Linux LTS 22
Component/s: Kernel
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
net: vlan: don't propagate flags on open
With the device instance lock, there is now a possibility of a deadlock:
1.211455] ============================================
[ 1.211571] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
[ 1.211687] 6.14.0-rc5-01215-g032756b4ca7a-dirty #5 Not tainted
[ 1.211823] --------------------------------------------
[ 1.211936] ip/184 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 1.212032] ffff8881024a4c30 (&dev->lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: dev_set_allmulti+0x4e/0xb0
[ 1.212207]
[ 1.212207] but task is already holding lock:
[ 1.212332] ffff8881024a4c30 (&dev->lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: dev_open+0x50/0xb0
[ 1.212487]
[ 1.212487] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 1.212626] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 1.212626]
[ 1.212751] CPU0
[ 1.212815] ----
[ 1.212871] lock(&dev->lock);
[ 1.212944] lock(&dev->lock);
[ 1.213016]
[ 1.213016] *** DEADLOCK ***
[ 1.213016]
[ 1.213143] May be due to missing lock nesting notation
[ 1.213143]
[ 1.213294] 3 locks held by ip/184:
[ 1.213371] #0: ffffffff838b53e0 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: rtnl_nets_lock+0x1b/0xa0
[ 1.213543] #1: ffffffff84e5fc70 (&net->rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: rtnl_nets_lock+0x37/0xa0
[ 1.213727] #2: ffff8881024a4c30 (&dev->lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: dev_open+0x50/0xb0
[ 1.213895]
[ 1.213895] stack backtrace:
[ 1.213991] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 184 Comm: ip Not tainted 6.14.0-rc5-01215-g032756b4ca7a-dirty #5
[ 1.213993] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Arch Linux 1.16.3-1-1 04/01/2014
[ 1.213994] Call Trace:
[ 1.213995] <TASK>
[ 1.213996] dump_stack_lvl+0x8e/0xd0
[ 1.214000] print_deadlock_bug+0x28b/0x2a0
[ 1.214020] lock_acquire+0xea/0x2a0
[ 1.214027] __mutex_lock+0xbf/0xd40
[ 1.214038] dev_set_allmulti+0x4e/0xb0 # real_dev->flags & IFF_ALLMULTI
[ 1.214040] vlan_dev_open+0xa5/0x170 # ndo_open on vlandev
[ 1.214042] __dev_open+0x145/0x270
[ 1.214046] __dev_change_flags+0xb0/0x1e0
[ 1.214051] netif_change_flags+0x22/0x60 # IFF_UP vlandev
[ 1.214053] dev_change_flags+0x61/0xb0 # for each device in group from dev->vlan_info
[ 1.214055] vlan_device_event+0x766/0x7c0 # on netdevsim0
[ 1.214058] notifier_call_chain+0x78/0x120
[ 1.214062] netif_open+0x6d/0x90
[ 1.214064] dev_open+0x5b/0xb0 # locks netdevsim0
[ 1.214066] bond_enslave+0x64c/0x1230
[ 1.214075] do_set_master+0x175/0x1e0 # on netdevsim0
[ 1.214077] do_setlink+0x516/0x13b0
[ 1.214094] rtnl_newlink+0xaba/0xb80
[ 1.214132] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x440/0x490
[ 1.214144] netlink_rcv_skb+0xeb/0x120
[ 1.214150] netlink_unicast+0x1f9/0x320
[ 1.214153] netlink_sendmsg+0x346/0x3f0
[ 1.214157] __sock_sendmsg+0x86/0xb0
[ 1.214160] ____sys_sendmsg+0x1c8/0x220
[ 1.214164] ___sys_sendmsg+0x28f/0x2d0
[ 1.214179] __x64_sys_sendmsg+0xef/0x140
[ 1.214184] do_syscall_64+0xec/0x1d0
[ 1.214190] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
[ 1.214191] RIP: 0033:0x7f2d1b4a7e56
Device setup:
netdevsim0 (down)
^ ^
bond netdevsim1.100@netdevsim1 allmulticast=on (down)
When we enslave the lower device (netdevsim0) which has a vlan, we
propagate vlan's allmuti/promisc flags during ndo_open. This causes
(re)locking on of the real_dev.
Propagate allmulti/promisc on flags change, not on the open. There
is a slight semantics change that vlans that are down now propagate
the flags, but this seems unlikely to result in the real issues.
Reproducer:
echo 0 1 > /sys/bus/netdevsim/new_device
dev_path=$(ls -d /sys/bus/netdevsim/devices/netdevsim0/net/*)
dev=$(echo $dev_path ( rev | cut -d/ -f1 | rev)
ip link set dev $dev name netdevsim0
ip link set dev netdevsim0 up
ip link add link netdevsim0 name netdevsim0.100 type vlan id 100
ip link set dev netdevsim0.100 allm
---truncated---
CREATE(Triage):(User=admin) [CVE-2025-23163|https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-23163)
