The Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) project, maintained by the MITRE Corporation, is a list of all standardized names for vulnerabilities and security exposures.
| ID | Description | Priority | Modified date | Fixed Release |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2008-4826 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-3853. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-3853. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-3853 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | REJECT | Nov 16, 2009 | n/a |
| CVE-2008-4920 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate was based on an incorrect claim regarding a directory issue in Agavi. The vendor has disputed the issue and the original researcher has retracted the original claim, so this is not a vulnerability. Further investigation by the vendor and original researcher show that the original issue was in a site-specific modification, which is outside the scope of CVE. Notes: CVE users should not use this identifier. | REJECT | Nov 7, 2008 | n/a |
| CVE-2008-5020 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-0017. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2008-0017. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-0017 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | REJECT | Mar 26, 2009 | n/a |
| CVE-2008-5850 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: None. Reason: this candidate was originally recorded for a SPLAT Remote Root Exploit that was claimed to exist for Check Point SmartCenter. The claim has no actionable details and was disclosed by a person of unknown reliability who did not coordinate with the vendor. No people of known reliability have confirmed the original claim. The vendor has not indicated that they are aware of any vulnerability. Since the claim has no actionable details or independent verification, it is outside the scope of CVE according to current inclusion criteria. | REJECT | Jan 15, 2009 | n/a |
| CVE-2008-6339 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-6339. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-6339. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-6339 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | REJECT | Sep 11, 2008 | n/a |
| CVE-2008-6426 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-6426. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-6426. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-6426 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | REJECT | Nov 7, 2023 | n/a |
| CVE-2008-6432 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-6432. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-6432. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-6432 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | REJECT | Nov 4, 2008 | n/a |
| CVE-2009-0189 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-1012. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2009-1012. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-1012 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | REJECT | Feb 1, 2011 | n/a |
| CVE-2009-0190 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-1016. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2009-1016. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-1016 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | REJECT | Feb 1, 2011 | n/a |
| CVE-2009-0300 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-2636. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2006-2636. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-2636 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | REJECT | Jan 29, 2009 | n/a |
| CVE-2009-0589 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | REJECT | Mar 26, 2009 | n/a |
| CVE-2009-0671 | ** REJECT ** Format string vulnerability in the University of Washington (UW) c-client library, as used by the UW IMAP toolkit imap-2007d and other applications, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via format string specifiers in the initial request to the IMAP port (143/tcp). NOTE: Red Hat has disputed the vulnerability, stating The Red Hat Security Response Team have been unable to confirm the existence of this format string vulnerability in the toolkit, and the sample published exploit is not complete or functional. CVE agrees that the exploit contains syntax errors and uses Unix-only include files while invoking Windows functions. | REJECT | Feb 26, 2009 | n/a |
| CVE-2009-0782 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that it was not a security issue. Notes: none. | REJECT | Mar 26, 2009 | n/a |
| CVE-2009-0786 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This was originally intended for a report about TCP Wrappers and the hosts_ctl API function, but further investigation showed that this was documented behavior by that function. Notes: Future CVE identifiers might be assigned to applications that mis-use the API in a security-relevant fashion. | REJECT | May 22, 2009 | n/a |
| CVE-2009-0795 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-0796, CVE-2009-1265. Reason: this candidate was intended for one issue, but a typo caused it to be associated with a different issue. Notes: All CVE users should consult CVE-2009-0796 and CVE-2009-1265 to determine which ID is appropriate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | REJECT | Apr 7, 2009 | n/a |
| CVE-2009-0907 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-1899. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-1899. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-1899 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | REJECT | Aug 13, 2009 | n/a |
| CVE-2009-1205 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2007-4475. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2007-4475. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2007-4475 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | REJECT | Apr 3, 2009 | n/a |
| CVE-2009-2086 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-1900. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-1900. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-1900 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | REJECT | Aug 13, 2009 | n/a |
| CVE-2009-2580 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-1862. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-1862. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-1862 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | REJECT | Jul 29, 2009 | n/a |
| CVE-2009-2645 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-2408. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-2408. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-2408 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | REJECT | Jul 31, 2009 | n/a |
| CVE-2009-2845 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-2768. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-2768. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-2768 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | REJECT | Aug 18, 2009 | n/a |
| CVE-2009-2962 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-2692. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-2692. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-2692 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | REJECT | Aug 21, 2009 | n/a |
| CVE-2009-3297 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-0787, CVE-2010-0788, CVE-2010-0789. Reason: this candidate was intended for one issue in Samba, but it was used for multiple distinct issues, including one in FUSE and one in ncpfs. Notes: All CVE users should consult CVE-2010-0787 (Samba), CVE-2010-0788 (ncpfs), and CVE-2010-0789 (FUSE) to determine which ID is appropriate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | REJECT | Mar 2, 2010 | n/a |
| CVE-2009-3610 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-3695. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-3695. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-3695 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | REJECT | Nov 9, 2009 | n/a |
| CVE-2009-3870 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-3870. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-3870. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-3870 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | REJECT | Jun 1, 2009 | n/a |
| CVE-2009-3906 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-3606. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-3606. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-3606 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | REJECT | Dec 11, 2009 | n/a |
| CVE-2009-3907 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-3607. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-3607. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-3607 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | REJECT | Dec 11, 2009 | n/a |
| CVE-2009-3908 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-3608. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-3608. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-3608 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | REJECT | Dec 11, 2009 | n/a |
| CVE-2009-4132 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-4214. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-4214. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-4214 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | REJECT | Dec 11, 2009 | n/a |
| CVE-2010-0099 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-0092. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2010-0092. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2010-0092 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | REJECT | Jul 22, 2010 | n/a |
| CVE-2010-0200 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-0200. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2010-0200. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2010-0200 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | REJECT | Apr 15, 2010 | n/a |
| CVE-2010-0735 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-0969. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2010-0969. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2010-0969 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | REJECT | Mar 18, 2010 | n/a |
| CVE-2010-1144 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-0751, CVE-2010-1277. Reason: this candidate was intended for one issue, but it was accidentally assigned to two different issues, one for libnids and another for Zabbix. Notes: All CVE users should consult CVE-2010-0751 (libnids) and CVE-2010-1277 (Zabbix) to determine which ID is appropriate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | REJECT | Apr 6, 2010 | n/a |
| CVE-2010-1145 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-4498. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-4498. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-4498 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | REJECT | May 20, 2010 | n/a |
| CVE-2010-1456 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-1455. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2010-1455. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2010-1455 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | REJECT | May 19, 2010 | n/a |
| CVE-2010-1564 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2009-1564. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2009-1564. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2009-1564 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | REJECT | Apr 14, 2010 | n/a |
| CVE-2010-1680 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2010. Notes: none. | REJECT | Dec 14, 2011 | n/a |
| CVE-2010-2052 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-2155. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2010-2155. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2010-2155 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | REJECT | Jun 7, 2010 | n/a |
| CVE-2010-2077 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-1640. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2010-1640. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2010-1640 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | REJECT | May 25, 2010 | n/a |
| CVE-2010-2533 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-2621. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2010-2621. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2010-2621 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | REJECT | Aug 20, 2010 | n/a |
| CVE-2010-3016 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-2803. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2010-2803. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2010-2803 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | REJECT | Aug 17, 2010 | n/a |
| CVE-2010-3408 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-1823. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2010-1823. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2010-1823 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | REJECT | Sep 28, 2010 | n/a |
| CVE-2010-3409 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-1824. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2010-1824. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2010-1824 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | REJECT | Sep 28, 2010 | n/a |
| CVE-2010-3410 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-1825. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2010-1825. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2010-1825 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | REJECT | Sep 28, 2010 | n/a |
| CVE-2010-3866 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-4207, CVE-2010-4208, CVE-2010-4209. Reason: This candidate originally combined three issues that affected different versions. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2010-4207, CVE-2010-4208, or CVE-2010-4209 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | REJECT | Nov 7, 2010 | n/a |
| CVE-2010-3932 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was in a CNA pool that was not assigned to any issues during 2010. Notes: none. | REJECT | Jan 20, 2011 | n/a |
| CVE-2010-4510 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-4150. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2010-4150. A typo caused the wrong ID to be used. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2010-4150 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | REJECT | Dec 6, 2010 | n/a |
| CVE-2011-0634 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2011-1002. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2011-1002. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2011-1002 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | REJECT | Feb 22, 2011 | n/a |
| CVE-2011-1152 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-3712. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2010-3712. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2010-3712 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | REJECT | Jul 27, 2011 | n/a |
| CVE-2011-1161 | ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2011-1160, CVE-2011-1162. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Further investigation showed that only two candidates, CVE-2011-1160 and CVE-2011-1162, were needed for the set of security issues in question. Notes: none. | REJECT | Dec 12, 2011 | n/a |
